Choosing between Zapier, Make (formerly Integromat), and n8n is one of the highest-leverage decisions a team can make in 2025. Your automation stack determines how fast you integrate apps, how reliably you run mission‑critical workflows, and how much you spend as usage scales. This comparison cuts through marketing copy and focuses on real capabilities, trade‑offs, and when to pick each platform for speed, reliability, security, and cost control.
Automation backbone in 2025: triggers → transform → route → act → observe.
Quick comparison overview (Zapier vs Make vs n8n)
Criteria
Zapier
Make
n8n
Best for
Fast, no‑code business automations and wide app coverage
Visual, branching workflows with granular control
Developer‑friendly, self‑hosted or cloud, open‑source extensibility
Integrations
10k+ ready‑made Zaps & apps
Thousands of modules; strong HTTP/routers
Hundreds of nodes + custom code/webhooks
Editor UX
Linear, opinionated, quick to ship
Canvas with branches, routers, iterators
Canvas + code, great for complex logic
Hosting
SaaS only
SaaS
Self‑host or Cloud (n8n Cloud)
Data control
Managed; limited infra control
Managed; enterprise options
Full control when self‑hosted
Extensibility
Platform dev & webhooks
Custom HTTP/JS functions
Write custom nodes; run code freely
Compliance
Public security docs; enterprise add‑ons
Security & compliance pages; enterprise tiers
Depends on your hosting stack (self‑host)
At a glance: strengths and trade‑offs across the big three.
Head‑to‑head feature analysis
Integrations and triggers
Zapier: The broadest marketplace and easiest setup for business tools. Strong polling and webhook triggers. See docs: platform.zapier.com.
Make: Deep modules and routers for multi‑branch flows; robust HTTP module for any API. Docs: make.com/en/help.
n8n: Powerful webhooks, native nodes, and first‑class custom code. Open‑source lets you add what’s missing. Docs: docs.n8n.io.
Workflow design and logic
Zapier: Linear flows with paths. Ideal for straightforward automations (e.g., lead routing, notifications, enrichment).
Make: Visual canvas shines for routers, iterators, and error branches. Great for ETL‑like flows and multi‑system sync.
n8n: Canvas + code blocks when needed; perfect for complex conditionals, enrichment, and custom integrations.
Error handling and observability
Zapier: Task history with retries, filters, and path logs.
Make: Scenario‑level run history with granular step logs and fallback routes.
n8n: Execution logs, retries, and dead‑letter patterns when self‑hosting with queues.
Design for failure: retries, fallbacks, alerts, and dead‑letter queues.
n8n: Self‑host for maximum control and residency; or use n8n Cloud. See n8n security and hosting.
Extensibility and custom code
Zapier: Build custom apps on the Zapier platform; strong for product teams offering integrations.
Make: HTTP and function modules extend coverage without leaving the canvas.
n8n: Write custom nodes; first‑class JS/TypeScript; integrate your own auth and secrets management when self‑hosting.
Pricing and value (read before you commit)
Each vendor updates plans and limits. Always confirm current tiers and quotas on official pages: Zapier pricing, Make pricing, and n8n Cloud. As a rule of thumb:
Zapier: You pay for tasks/executions. Excellent for quick wins and broad coverage; costs can rise with heavy usage.
Make: You pay for operations; strong value for complex, multi‑step scenarios with branching.
n8n: Self‑hosted can be the most cost‑effective at scale (infra + ops trade‑offs). Cloud plans available for convenience.
Tip: Instrument your automations early. Track monthly volume, failure rate, and cost per successful outcome so you can model ROI and avoid surprises.
Use‑case scenarios: when each tool wins
Zapier wins when: you need fast, reliable business automations with popular SaaS tools, minimal setup, and business‑friendly UI.
Make wins when: you build branching, multi‑path flows with iterators, conditional routers, and ETL‑like transformations.
n8n wins when: you require data residency, custom logic, or deep integrations and are comfortable owning infrastructure (or want open‑source flexibility).
Performance, reliability, and scale
All three publish documentation and status resources. See Zapier status and vendor docs for recommended limits and best practices.
Design for idempotency and backoff. Use webhooks where possible to reduce polling latency.
For high volume: add queues, dead‑letters, and alerting. n8n self‑host gives you full control; Make/Zapier provide managed guardrails.
User experience and collaboration
Zapier: Clean, approachable; non‑technical teams move fast. Good pathing and filters.
Make: Visual canvas and mapping interface excel at clarity for complex flows.
n8n: Technical but rewarding; version control friendly, great for product and data teams.
Integration capabilities: APIs, auth, and webhooks
Webhooks: All support inbound/outbound webhooks. Prefer signed webhooks and verify on receipt.
Auth: OAuth 2.0 and API key patterns are supported; n8n self‑host lets you tailor secret storage to your standards.
Custom apps: Zapier’s developer platform is mature for vendors; n8n custom nodes are ideal for proprietary or internal systems.
Security & compliance essentials
Minimize data: Pass the minimum fields needed. Avoid sensitive free text in payloads.
Audit trails: Log who changed what and when. Use separate service accounts for critical connectors.
Secrets: Rotate regularly; prefer managed vaults (for n8n self‑host) and least‑privilege scopes for OAuth.
Fast hosting for docs/dashboards: Hostinger — reliable WordPress or static sites for runbooks and status pages.
Domains for webhooks & apps: Namecheap — clean subdomains for api.example.com and hooks.example.com.
Find lifetime deals and add‑ons: AppSumo — discover loggers, uptime monitors, and helper tools.
Disclosure: Some links are affiliate links. If you click and purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend tools we’d use ourselves.
